In terms of those stress test edge cases, the truth is that Crysis 3's jungle levels can see Ryzen 7 2700X dip beneath 60fps (i7 is generally fine) and the original Crysis's Ascension level can tank an 8700K running at 5.0GHz to 40fps or lower. In essence then, buying a higher-end CPU is more about buying extra overhead for edge cases, as opposed to running the chip flat-out 100 per cent of the time. While that is the case for most titles, there's a bunch I've played where this palpably isn't true. There's also a prevailing feeling that 60fps gaming is a relatively easy target for most modern CPUs, something I wanted to test.
#Cpu stress test 2018 full#
Now I'm wondering, which profile is better to 24/7 use.ġst profile has lower spikes (1.336V) with average load.Ģnd profile has higher spikes (1.336/1.344 sometimes) but lower full load Vcore - 1. assessing game performance, I went with a smaller range of titles designed to show a range of different CPU profiles, from games that favour single-core power to one of the best multi-threaded game engines I've seen in recent times. Why in this test load voltage is lower? Is Linpack without AVX less demanding than with AVX? Or maybe it's higher so Vdroop is higher? What do you think?ĮDIT: Settings with Level 4 are stable - 7.5 H OCCT Linpack AVX passed. I wonder about load voltage (1.304V or even 1.296V) when OCCT Linpack without AVX is running. These settings gives some spikes to 1.344V at average load. Additional Turbo Voltage set to minimum = +0.004V. Additional Turbo Voltage set to minimum = +0.004VĪbove settings gives some spikes to 1.336 V at average load. In normal usage there is no problem at all until now. It passed 5.5 hours of OCCT Small Data Set test.
#Cpu stress test 2018 update#
Ok guys, here is the little update to my OC results:Īctually I have one profile which I think is stable (99%).
#Cpu stress test 2018 Pc#
just what's best for you under the anticipated loads and conditions you expose your PC to. Like most things PC related, there is no "best" for everyone. To put it in simpler terms, if you live near the shore at 75 feet above sea level, when you add a trailer hitch to your compact SUV to haul your new 260 pound Skidoo to the beach 14 miles away, is there really any value to testing the hitch and engine / tranny / fuel mixture by hauling a 10,000 pound load up and over the Rocky Mountains ? Your hitch / SUV will never see that load nor the thin air of the Rockies. but do you care since PC will never see similar loadings again ?
Yes, it might not get by synthetics because you hit temps that aren't comfy. It could very will be that a OC limited by OC temps to 4.8 Ghz using synthetics, can reach 5.0 Ghz under RoG Real Bench. OTOH, I have had 24 stable synthetic OCs fail under a multi tasking benchmark in < 20 minutes. the question is, is their value to you ? As the saying goes, many folk "won't be able to sleep at night" knowing that there's some set of conditions which could be created, even artificially, that would make an OC unstable. I am not saying there is no value to using synthetics. Your stable OC will be significantly lower than it otherwise would be because no set of conditions will ever place such a single task loading on your PC again.
conditions which your CPU will never be exposed to in its liufetime, then test will one of, or even, ALL of the synthetics. If your goal is to be able to say you tested your OC under the most extreme and unrealistic conditions. If your goal is test stability in a multitasking environment using real world applications to get the best OC you can then RoG Real Bench is your best bet.
0 kommentar(er)
